Daubert and the Law and Science of 
Expert Testimony in Business Litigation

Home 

A Daubert 
Introduction 

Securities 
  Applications 

Antitrust 
Applications 

Employment 
Discrimination 

The Impact of 
Kumho Tire 

Econometric 
Issues 

For the 
Aficionado 

Annotated 
Links 

Contact 
Information 

Lose on liability and still "win" the case?
Lawyers are obtaining desirable outcomes for clients, even after losing on liability, by using new post-Daubert techniques to exclude expert testimony that links the act or omission for which their client has been found liable to the money damages that are sought by plaintiffs. Among the most recent and most well publicized of these is Black v. Food Lion from the 5th Circuit, where a jury had awarded several hundred thousand dollars in a slip and fall case after plaintiff's expert opined that the fall had caused a hormonal imbalance that in turn triggered a rare malady. The expert's testimony was subsequently excluded and damages were reduced to about 3% of the original award. Food Lion lost on liability but seemingly obtained a desired outcome.

Recently, a Florida appeals court reversed a $4.4 million verdict in DuPont v. Castillo, 1999 Fla. App. Lexis 1447, disallowing the expert testimony that linked chemical exposure to a birth defect.

While this page is currently little more than a footnote, the idea is too important not to mention. More will appear here shortly.

| Home | Contact Us |